How an Oregon court became the stage for a $115,000 showdown between Meta and Facebook creators

A few of the most profitable creators on Fb aren’t names you’d ever acknowledge. Actually, a lot of their pages do not have a face or recognizable persona connected. As an alternative, they run pages devoted to memes, animal movies and sure, AI-generated images and movies.

The individuals behind these pages are specialists at creating content material that may catch Fb’s algorithm and go viral. Profitable pages can generate tens of hundreds of {dollars} a month from efficiency bonuses, revenue-sharing and different monetization packages that pay Fb creators for standard content material.

For years, Meta fostered this business of viral content material on Fb. As the corporate remodeled Fb’s principal feed right into a “discovery engine” of beneficial posts from random pages and accounts, creators provided a stream of content material crafted for the algorithm. However during the last yr, some creators say this dynamic has damaged down. Meta has penalized creators for the exact same content material it as soon as rewarded. Different creators have seen Fb’s fee methods break down attributable to glitches and different errors.

One creator has grow to be so annoyed, he is filed dozens of lawsuits in small claims court docket in opposition to Meta during the last yr. A few of these lawsuits are associated to lacking funds and account points he is skilled, however he is additionally introduced 23 instances associated to different creators’ Fb pages. As a number of of these instances at the moment are winding their means by way of small claims court docket, he hopes his actions will carry consideration to what he says is a wider breakdown in Meta’s relationship with Fb creators.

The instances shine a lightweight on how Meta’s lack of human-centered customer support can impression creators who depend on the platform. However it additionally gives a glimpse into the risky dynamics of viral Fb content material.

Mel Bouzad is a former photojournalist for Getty Pictures who for the previous eight years has made his residing operating standard Fb pages with names like “The Meme Bros” and “FunkiestShitEver.” He posts memes, journey content material and AI-generated movies. Over time, he is grow to be an skilled at determining what kind of content material is most definitely to rack up views and feedback on Fb.

“It is principally leaping on the traits as they’re occurring,” he explains. “In case you can bounce on the trending matters proper at first, then you definately get the momentum, it kicks within the algorithm, and it sends your content material viral. And if one publish goes viral, the algorithm goes to ship the following publish viral, as a result of it thinks the following publish goes to get the identical kind of engagement.” He is additionally realized little methods for drawing extra Fb feedback: including a small error in a travel-focused listicle, or asking questions like “what’s probably the most boring state in America?”

He estimates that at their peak, his pages collectively earned between $10,000 to $20,000 a month — primarily from efficiency bonuses and in-stream video advertisements — although they often earned way more than that. Final September, 12 of his pages earned greater than $68,0000 mixed in efficiency bonuses, in line with paperwork seen by Engadget.

However final yr, 5 of his meme and journey pages have been abruptly demonetized. The pages obtained a “monetization coverage violation,” a imprecise, catch-all time period that may describe many supposed infractions. After some digging, he found they’d been flagged for allegedly working in a rustic ineligible for Meta’s monetization packages. “To monetize, it’s essential to reside in an eligible nation the place the product or characteristic is out there,” a discover within the Fb app mentioned. “It’s possible you’ll lose your capability to monetize when you transfer to an ineligible location or if Fb modifications product eligibility.” Bouzad, who lives in the US, assumed it was a misunderstanding and could be a straightforward repair.

However, like so many others, he rapidly discovered that getting assist from Meta was removed from simple. “Regardless of 20+ assist tickets and utilizing paid assist, I obtain solely automated replies,” he later wrote in his first submitting in small claims court docket final November.

Bouzad had heard of individuals utilizing small claims court docket to get Meta’s consideration and determined to strive it for himself. “I assumed, I will go in and sue for just one web page … one thing small, simply to get within the door (and) communicate to any individual.” At that time, Meta was withholding $2,498 in funds from the web page referred to as “Man Cave USA,” in line with court docket paperwork. He requested Meta pay the excellent stability, together with $409 to cowl court docket charges and curiosity.

His submitting succeeded in getting a response from Meta. Bouzad mentioned that about three weeks later he obtained a name from a regulation agency representing the social media firm. After an prolonged backwards and forwards, Meta ultimately restored the web page’s capability to earn cash. By February he formally dropped the case, telling the court docket that the corporate had “corrected the problem and remitted the funds owed.”

Meta’s conflicting explanations

Whereas he was coping with that case, he tried to resolve the problems associated to his different pages. Since he was nonetheless in mediation with Meta for his “Man Cave USA” web page, he requested Meta’s representatives if they might assist together with his different pages. He says that in a mediation session over Zoom, Meta’s authorized reps informed him they would not assist with different pages until they have been tied to a lawsuit.

So in February he opened six new small claims court docket instances in opposition to the corporate. On the time, he mentioned, Meta owed him greater than $40,000 in unpaid invoices from accounts that had been wrongfully flagged; $15,000 of which have been earnings from a single Fb web page. As a result of small claims court docket limits damages to $10,000 per case, he might solely sue for a mixed $35,000, however hoped that Meta would reinstate the funds if it have been to re-examine his accounts.

Within the meantime, Bouzad continued to attempt to resolve his account points by way of Meta’s official assist channels and obtained complicated, and generally downright conflicting, info. In a single electronic mail, Meta assist informed him he had been flagged for “restricted originality of content material,” however did not clarify. He additionally, once more, obtained notifications saying that he was in a rustic that was “ineligible” for Meta’s monetization packages.

In two separate chats with Meta Verified, the social community’s paid subscription service for buyer assist, he was knowledgeable that he was ineligible as a result of his web page was linked to a checking account in Malta. The representatives then closed the chats with out giving him a possibility to reply, in line with screenshots seen by Engadget. Bouzad was getting an increasing number of annoyed. “One, I’ve by no means been to Malta, two, my financial institution is Wells Fargo and three, I dwell in Oregon,” he says.

He now sees his points as a part of a wider sample from Meta. Whereas the corporate had as soon as supplied him with a accomplice supervisor — a Fb worker who might assist kind out points and supply recommendation — he hasn’t had a devoted contact on the firm since 2020.

To him, the issue is twofold: Meta has grow to be overly reliant on synthetic intelligence for content material moderation, which leads to too many errors. On the similar time, he claims Meta has largely outsourced the customer support it does supply — like by way of Meta Verified — and these staff aren’t in a position to deal with the varieties of points he and different creators more and more encounter.

Some creators who Bouzad has named in his lawsuits declare to have missed out on tens of hundreds of {dollars} in funds for what they describe as glitches in Meta’s processes. Brent, a creator who requested to be recognized by his first identify solely, was operating a profitable Fb web page that posts history-themed AI-generated movies. One latest clip includes a group of supposed German prisoners-of-war strolling by way of the snow, accompanied by a caption claiming that some POWs selected to immigrate to Canada following the conflict after experiencing “humane therapy” from their captors.

The web page was doing effectively for just a few months till April, when Meta requested Brent to confirm his identification as a way to hold receiving funds. His account had greater than $11,000 in unpaid earnings on the time, in line with paperwork reviewed by Engadget.

A number of months later, Brent has been unable to finish this seemingly mundane step, regardless of repeatedly offering Meta a replica of his ID. Brent says that the problem stems from Meta mistakenly classifying his payout account as a “personal company” somewhat than a “private account.” He says he has spent hundreds of {dollars} on Meta Verified (the best tier prices $500 a month) and has opened quite a few assist instances however has not been in a position to get the problem resolved.

One other creator is caught after encountering an identical challenge that prevented him from confirming the tax info related together with his payout account on Fb. “My payout earnings have been locked attributable to non editable ‘greyed out’ particulars when it got here to getting into tax info and different fields,” the creator defined. “After a few yr of attempting to get assist Meta lastly got here again with an archaic type to switch the payout account to a brand new one related to my web page.” However, after filling out the shape for the switch, Meta knowledgeable him that the greater than $16,000 in unpaid earnings from his web page have been unable to be transferred to a brand new account.

The creator, who requested to stay nameless, has spent greater than a decade operating music-related pages championing unbiased artists on the platform. “We’re collectively sick of how Meta treats everybody, failing to supply sufficient assist, reasoning, studies and outcomes for content material creators,” he informed Engadget. “There’s little to no consistency or confidence of their capability to pretty reward creators.” He is additionally battling stage 4 most cancers, and says the lacking funds have interfered together with his therapy, and added to the stress he is already dealing with. His medical doctors just lately knowledgeable him he doubtless has just a few months left to dwell; he is nonetheless hoping to recuperate the lacking funds.

Gaps in assist

Social media is stuffed with quite a few complaints in regards to the ineffectiveness of Fb’s assist instruments, together with Meta Verified. Daniel Abas, the president and founding father of the Creators Guild of America, a nonprofit group that advocates for creators, says that demonetization is a “power challenge” affecting creators on many platforms, together with Meta’s. “What’s actually tough is just not having consistency by way of the enforcement and having insurance policies which can be opaque, having appeals processes which can be inconsistent,” he mentioned.

Abas says that creators, particularly high-earning ones, ought to have extra assets to get assist from firms like Meta. “Working with an online chat to get one thing resolved, or submitting an electronic mail to get one thing resolved, and never having that human contact is a serious hole, and contributes to plenty of stress and plenty of uncertainty if you’re attempting to construct an organization.”

Meta has seemingly been altering a number of the requirements it has for creators on Fb during the last yr. The corporate in latest months started to crack down on creators sharing spammy and “low high quality” content material, although it solely described just a few particular examples of such exercise, like pages that share posts with “lengthy, distracting captions.” The corporate doesn’t prohibit creators from monetizing AI-generated content material. Actually, Mark Zuckerberg just lately mentioned that Meta plans so as to add a “large corpus” of AI content material to its methods.

Meta declined to supply a remark for this story. The corporate maintains Bouzad has violated its insurance policies, and has argued his court docket instances involving different Fb customers needs to be dismissed.

Bouzad insists that he has by no means deliberately violated Fb’s guidelines, and has grown annoyed with the corporate’s altering explanations for why his pages have been demonetized. In an electronic mail with Meta Verified assist, a customer support rep informed him a latest violation for considered one of his journey pages was attributable to “Restricted Originality of Contents,” however did not level to a selected publish. Throughout mediation, although, Meta’s authorized crew claimed the identical web page had been producing views by way of “inauthentic engagement,” in line with paperwork reviewed by Engadget. Bouzad pushed again. “This wasn’t manipulation — it was performance-based publicity … we’re being punished for the very conduct the system rewarded,” he wrote in an electronic mail to Meta’s authorized crew.

In paperwork reviewed by Engadget, Meta does not clarify its allegation of inauthentic engagement. However the firm did inform Bouzad it might be keen to pay him $5,000 — a fraction of what he claims to be owed — to settle the instances although it was standing by its resolution to demonetize his pages. Bouzad declined. He believes that Meta is unfairly concentrating on him and different creators who run high-earning Fb pages.

Bouzad says he is heard numerous tales from different creators who’ve additionally been hit with imprecise “monetization web page violations” which have stalled their funds. Very like he skilled, these account flags do not describe the supposed infraction and do not give a possibility for an enchantment. This, he says, leaves creators with few choices outdoors of the authorized system.

An uncommon authorized maneuver

After submitting his second batch of small claims court docket instances in February, he started to achieve out to his community and began submitting extra instances. Bouzad is just not a lawyer and has no authorized coaching; he is relied on ChatGPT and Gemini to information his authorized technique. A lot of that technique depends on exhibiting that different creators have allowed him to sue on their behalf by way of a course of referred to as an task of claims. He filed 25 such instances in 2025.

Changing into a authorized assignee is at finest an uncommon transfer for small claims court docket. A number of authorized specialists contacted by Engadget mentioned they’d by no means heard of anybody doing so. “Usually, I do not suppose you see assigned claims in small claims (court docket),” Richard Slottee, a retired Oregon-based legal professional, who has beforehand suggested purchasers on small claims court docket instances. He mentioned he was uncertain of the legality of the transfer.

Marion County Circuit Courtroom Choose Lindsay Partridge, who’s presiding over Bouzad’s small claims court docket case, appears equally perplexed by the problem. In an October 23 listening to, he mentioned that “there are some kind of claims that beneath Oregon regulation, an anti-assignment clause wouldn’t be enforceable” however that he was uncertain if the statute would apply on this specific case. “I attempted to do a bunch of analysis on this,” he mentioned “I simply cannot discover a solution to it.”

Meta, however, has argued that its phrases of service clearly prohibit customers from transferring their rights to different events with out its consent. “Based mostly on the No Switch Clause, this Courtroom shouldn’t allow Mr. Bouzad to proceed recruiting Fb customers from everywhere in the world and flooding its docket with instances the place he claims standing based mostly on an invalid task,” a Meta mission supervisor wrote in a letter to the decide. In the course of the listening to, Choose Partridge mentioned he was “involved” that “what I’ve is basically a really technical authorized challenge that is being offered by two non-attorneys.” He mentioned he would wish “just a little bit extra time” to decide on whether or not Bouzad might transfer ahead as an assignee.

The group Bouzad helps consists primarily of colleagues, buddies and friends-of-friends who had heard about his small claims instances. And although just a few of the people are individuals he is partnered with prior to now, he says he has no monetary stake within the success of their pages. “It is energy in numbers, we felt the extra individuals, the extra noise we might make, the higher the probabilities of getting points resolved,” Bouzad says. “They gave me their instances to try to get that assist (to) drive Fb to repair their pages.” However there’s additionally a doubtlessly profitable payday for him if he succeeds. As an assignee, he has the only proper to gather any judgment that in the end comes out of the opposite creator’s claims.

For a number of the creators concerned, the quantity at stake is much larger than what Bouzad has claimed in his flings. One UK-based creator who has assigned their declare to Bouzad runs a dog-themed Fb web page that generated greater than $60,000 from in-stream video advertisements throughout a one-month interval final yr, in line with paperwork seen by Engadget. Like Bouzad, their web page was hit with an unexplained “MPV” violation that has affected their attain. “Because of its authentic content material and area of interest viewers, the Fb algorithm usually rewards it with excessive attain and frequent placement within the suggestion feed,” Bouzad wrote in a small claims court docket submitting that claimed $1,000 in damages. “This pure visibility has now been unfairly disabled by Meta.”

One other creator, who requested to not be recognized out of worry of retaliation from Meta, requested him to look into three of his Fb pages, which collectively have greater than 1.5 million followers. All three had been demonetized by Meta and, like Bouzad, the creator obtained conflicting explanations about why.

He was informed two of the pages have been flagged for “restricted originality” although he informed Engadget he solely posts movies which can be scripted and filmed by him and his enterprise companions. His pages are devoted to scripted sketches filmed to appear like real-life encounters. They typically present individuals in seemingly mundane conditions turning into inexplicably offended, with descriptions like “Trainer Karen Calls for to Know Why I’m Selecting Up My Child,” or “I Gave Sweet to Youngsters and Apparently That’s ‘Fallacious’ Now.”

The third web page was hit with a “monetization web page violation” for residing in an “ineligible nation,” although, in line with the creator, it was managed from the US and the EU, each of that are eligible to take part in Meta’s packages. Engadget has additionally verified the web page supervisor areas utilizing Fb’s web page transparency info.

Bouzad filed two small claims court docket instances associated to those three pages. The 2 that had been flagged for restricted originality ultimately had their monetization restored and the case was dismissed. “I believe Mel’s serving to immensely,” he informed Engadget. “The truth that he bought us the 2 pages again helped us as a enterprise loads.”

The second case, associated to the web page with the “MPV” flag, remains to be pending. The creator, who has labored with Bouzad prior to now, says he is grateful for the authorized assist, however more and more annoyed with Meta. The demonetized web page was his highest-earning web page, making between $3,000 – $5,000 a month from video advertisements on Fb, in line with paperwork filed as a part of the small claims lawsuit. He does not perceive why Meta continues to penalize it when the web page posts related content material as his different accounts. “We have at all times been following the foundations, as a result of that is our enterprise, it is how we pay the payments,” he says. However, he says that Fb’s continued errors has made it “extraordinarily tough” to take care of a enterprise as a creator.

What’s subsequent

Of the 32 instances Bouzad has filed, eight have been resolved after Meta addressed the underlying challenge. 9 instances have been dismissed by Bouzad because the creators selected to pursue authorized motion in different states. Fifteen instances, together with six associated to Bouzad’s personal pages, are nonetheless open. In July, a decide consolidated Bouzad’s remaining instances right into a single declare, regardless of a movement from Bouzad to maintain the instances separate. “The instances affected by this order contain an identical events, elevate considerably related claims, and collectively search damages that exceed the jurisdictional limits of the small claims court docket,” a decide wrote. Bouzad is at the moment searching for greater than $115,0000 in damages, $35,000 of that are from his personal pages, over unpaid invoices, submitting charges and different bills associated to his months-long battle over Fb’s monetization practices.

In response to Bouzad, the precise quantity owed to him and the opposite creators is much larger. “Precise unpaid earnings exceed $220,000,” he wrote in a submitting, “however quantities have been capped in accordance with small claims jurisdictional limits.”

For now, Bouzad’s claims cannot transfer ahead till the decide guidelines on whether or not Bouzad can proceed as an assignee. If the decide decides in his favor, he’ll be capable to make his arguments to the circuit court docket decide overseeing the case. If the decide guidelines in Meta’s favor, he’ll solely be capable to transfer ahead with the claims pertaining to his personal Fb pages.

Bouzad says he’s ready for the battle. He has painstakingly compiled greater than 1,000 pages of court docket paperwork, screenshots and information clippings for his case. In his submitting, he alleges Meta is in breach of contract over the lacking funds. He says Meta has persistently flagged creators’ accounts with imprecise “MPV” violations, made enforcement errors, delayed funds and ignored appeals. He acknowledges that his months-long authorized battle, and his lowered earnings, have taken a toll on his private life. “Taking up Fb, it isn’t such as you’re suing a mother and pop store,” he says. “You are suing one of many largest companies on the planet, and it has brought about plenty of stress.”

His objective remains to be to get the monetization restrictions lifted from the Fb pages and for Meta to renew its funds to him and the opposite creators. “I simply need the pages mounted and the cash paid that is owed,” he mentioned. He has a whole lot of journey movies saved and able to publish on his Fb pages if and when his monetization is restored.

Have a tip for Karissa? You possibly can attain her by electronic mail, on X, Bluesky, Threads, or ship a message to @karissabe.51 to talk confidentially on Sign.